At our earlier October meeting, with a prospective new member (Melissa) in attendance, we had a great chance to discuss some of the things that define the Rebel Writers and its culture as a critique group:
- We are willing, and routinely do, review full novel manuscripts of our members, giving reviewing members a month or two to complete their read, with notes and summary due to the author.
- Members often get a full two hours of feedback on their novel-length manuscripts by a small group, with plenty of room for open discussion, comparing and contrasting of responses to the work, possible debate among critiquers, and even additional input from the author.
- However, the author whose work is being critiqued has no obligation in the discussion, other than to listen carefully and politely, which should be his or her primary role in the critique session. Our format does, however, give the author opportunity to try to explain intent and design in the writing, especially in response to questions and in order that the group can make suggestions to help the writer achieve his or her goals even better. The critquee has no obligation to assent or accede in any manner to any praise or criticism. The author should simply take away all the input and consider, on his or her own, what feedback works, what resonates and, therefore, what should influence revision of the manuscript.
That’s the way to do it! Go Rebels.
Rebel Writers 